Integrative models of Education for Citizenship (Handbook) - 2nd edition

Autores/as

Miguel Corbí Santamaría, Universidad de Burgos; Eva Mª García Terceño, Universidad de Burgos; Almudena Alonso Centeno, Universidad de Burgos; Ileana María Rosa Greca Dufranc, Universidad de Burgos; Delfín Ortega Sánchez, Universidad de Burgos; Jairo Ortiz Revilla, Universidad de Burgos; Esther Sanz de la Cal, Universidad de Burgos; Jakub Lipták, Universidad de Presov; Iveta Polák Čuchtová, Universidad de Presov; Ewa Parucka, Universidad Adam Mickiewicz de Poznan; Monika Powęska, Universidad Adam Mickiewicz de Poznan; Kerstin Hansen, Europa-Universität Flensburg (Germany); Tobias Sohr, Europa-Universität Flensburg (Germany); Lise Olsen, The University of British Columbia (Canada)

Palabras clave:

Educación, modelos integrados, ciudadanía, inclusión, equidad

Sinopsis

Desarrollar una ciudadanía activa es esencial para alcanzar una participación social bajo principios como el respeto mutuo y la no violencia, de acuerdo con los derechos humanos. Nuestra sociedad necesita formar personas con capacidad de decisión y pensamiento crítico para afrontar los problemas actuales. Esta segunda edición del manual completa a la primera con algunas modificaciones del capítulo de matemáticas e incluye un nuevo capítulo sobre el papel de la Educación Física en los modelos integrados. De esta manera, el manual ofrece a los lectores una perspectiva más global sobre qué son los modelos integrados de educación, apostando por dirigir los esfuerzos hacia un concepto de educación más inclusivo y acercando a los profesionales de la educación al concepto de ciudadanía activa y su aplicación en el aula. La experiencia de la primera edición nos ha demostrado que este manual supone un magnífico punto de partida para desarrollar alternativas innovadoras de educación con matices de aquellas competencias que nuestra sociedad actual demanda con fuerza.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Resumen 254

Citas

Abs HJ. Options for developing European strategies on citizenship education. European Educational Research Journal. 2021; 20(3): p. 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904121994418

Aikenhead G. STS education: a rose by any other name. En Cross R, editor. A vision for science education: responding to the work of Peter J. Fensham.: Routledge Falmer; 2003. p. 59-75. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203006436-5

Alonso-Centeno A, Ortiz-Revilla J, Greca IM, Sanz de la Cal E. Perceptions of STEAM+ CLIL integration: results of a co-teaching proposal during initial teacher training. En Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching.: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08697-7_10

Álvarez-Bueno C, Pesce C, Cavero-Redondo I, Sánchez-López M, Martínez-Hortelano JA, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. The effect of physical activity interventions on children's cognition and metacognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2017; 56(9): p. 729-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.012

Barrios-Silva BSC. La formación interdisciplinaria del maestro primario desde la educación agropecuaria en la escuela cubana actual. Mendive. Revista de Educación. 2020; 18(2): p. 394-411.

Beacco JC, Byram M. From linguistic diversity to plurilingual education: guide for the development of language education policies in Europe. Strasbourg.

Beane JA, Brodhagen BL. Teaching in middle schools. En V. R, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. Washington, DC: AERA; 2001. p. 1157-1174.

Bentley K. The TKT teaching knowledge test course CLIL module. Content and language integrated learning New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024792

Boaler J. What's math got to do with it?: How teachers and parents can transform mathematics learning and inspire success: Penguin; 2015.

Bolte C, Rauch F. Enhancing inquiry-based science education and teacher's continuous professional development in Europe: insights and reflections on the PROFILES project and other projects funded by the European Commission. Berlin.

Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How people learn Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

Brousseau G. Theory of didactical situation in Mathematics New York: Springer; 2002.

Bruner JS. The act of discovery. Understanding Children. 1961;: p. 10-24.

Bruner JS. Toward a theory of instruction: Harvard University Press; 1966.

Burmark L. Visual literacy: learn to see. See to learn Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development; 2002.

Bybee RW, Taylor JA, Gardner A, Van Scotter P, Powell JC, Westbrook A, et al. The BSCS 5E instructional model: origins and effectiveness Colorado Springs: BSCS; 2006.

Cambridge Dictionary. [Online] Acceso 01 de Februaryde 2023. Disponible en: HYPERLINK "https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/equity" .

Chu HE, Martin SN, Park J. A theoretical framework for developing an intercultural STEAM program for Australian and Korean students to enhance science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2019; 17(7): p. 1251-1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9922-y

Cioni G, Sgandurra G. Chapter 1 - Normal psychomotor development. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2013; 111: p. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52891-9.00001-4

Constantino T. STEAM by another name: transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Education Policy Review. 2018; 119(2): p. 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973

Cowie B, McGregor D, Finlayson O, McLoughlin E, van Kampen P, PSC. Strategies for the assessment of inquiry learning in science (SAILS).

Coyle D, Hood P, Marsh D. CLIL. Content and language integrated learning Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549

Coyle D. Content and language integrated learning: motivating learners and teachers. En The CLIL Teachers Toolkit: a classroom guide. Nottingham: University of Nottingham; 2007.

Coyle D. Planning tools for teachers Nottingham: University of Nottingham; 2005.

Coyle D. Theory and planning for effective classrooms: Supporting students in content and language integrated learning contexts. En Masih J. Learning through a foreign language: Models, methods and outcomes. London: CILT Publications; 1999.

Dalton-Puffer C. Content-and-language integrated learning: from practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2011; 31: p. 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092

Delgado R. La integración de los saberes bajo el enfoque deialéctico globalizador: la interdisciplinariedad y transdisciplinariedad en educación. Investigación y postgrado. 2009; 3(11-44): p. 24.

Dobbin F, Kalev A. Why doesn't diversity training work? The challenge for industry and academia. Anthropology Now. 2018; 10(2): p. 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/19428200.2018.1493182

Duru-Bellat M, Minga A. Measuring excellence and equity in education: Conceptual and methodological issues. En Equity and excellence in education.: Routledge; 2010. p. 33-50.

Elkins J, editor. Visual literacy New York: Routledge; 2009. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939574

ENGAGE. ENGAGE Project.

EquityTool. [Online] Acceso 1 de Februaryde 2023. Disponible en: HYPERLINK "https://www.equitytool.org/equity/" .

European Comission. Science education for responsible citizenship. Luxembourg.

Eurydice. Aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lenguas (AICLE) en el contexto escolar europeo. Madrid.

Fransecky RB, Debes JL. Visual literacy: a way to learn - a way to teach Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology; 1972.

Goris JA, Denessen EJPG, Verhoeven LTW. Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe. A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal. 2019; 18(6): p. 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119872426

Greca IM, Ortega-Sánchez D. STEAM didactic methods for citizenship. En Ortega-Sánchez D, Greca IM, Alonso-Abad MP. Science in art. The cathedral of Burgos as a ATEAM element for citizenship education. Barcelona: Octaedro Editorial; 2022. p. 177-195.

Greca IM, Sanz de la Cal E. La narración como eje para integrar STEAM y el aprendizaje de una segunda lengua: el modelo SeLFiE. En: 30 encuentros Internacionales de las Ciencias ExperimentalesGranada; 2022 p. 669-704.

Gresnigt R, Taconis R, van Keulen H, Gravemeijer K, Baartman L. Promoting science and technology in primary education: a review of integrated curricula. Studies in Science Education. 2014; 50(1): p. 47-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694

Gutiérrez-Cordero R, Cremades-Begines A, Perea-Díaz B. La interdisciplinariedad de la música en la etapa de educación primaria. Espacio y Tiempo, Revista de Ciencias Humanas. 2011; 25: p. 151-161.

Haynes JD, Sakai K, Rees G, Gilbert S, Frith C, Passingham RE. Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Current Biology. 2007; 17(4): p. 323-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.072

Heras M, Ruiz-Mellén I. Responsible research and innovation indicators for science education assessment: how to measure the impact? International Journal of Science Education. 2017; 39(18): p. 2482-2507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1392643

Huang C, Li G, Zhang Y, Aphichaithawon N, Deng Z, Zhang Z, et al. The influence of physical education courses integrated with civic education on prosocial behavior among college students: the chain mediating effect of cultural confidence and self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1217290

Irving H. Gender and the constitution. Equity and agency in comparative constitutional design: Cambridge University Press; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619687

Kassay F. Aj učiť sa treba učiť Bratislava: Smena; 1990.

Kmeť M. Metodika výtvarnej výchovy orientovanej na proces tvorby Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave; 2021.

LaPrade RF, Agel J, Baker J, Brenner JS, Cordasco FA, Côté J, et al. AOSSM Early Sport Specialization Consensus Statement. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016; 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116644241

Lazo-Pérez MA. La interdisciplinariedad y la integralidad una necesidad de los profesionales de la educación. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo. 2011; 27.

Le Grand J. Equity and choice: an essay in economics and applied philosophy: Routledge; 1991.

Levels of physical activity, family functioning and self-concept in elementary and High School Education students: a structural equation model. Children. 2023; 10(1): p. 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010163

Lin CL, Tsai CY. The effect of a pedagogical STEAM model on students' project competence and learning motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2021; 30(1): p. 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09885-x

Marsh D, Maljers A, Hartiala AK. Profiling European CLIL classrooms. Languages opendoors Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä; 2001.

Marsh D. Bilingual education and content and language integrated learning. International Association for Cross-cultural Communication. Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua) Paris: University of Sorbonne; 1994.

Marsh D. CLIL/EMILE. The European dimension: actions, trends and foresight potentia Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä ; 2002.

Martin-Hansen L. Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher. 2002; 69(2): p. 34-37.

McIntosh E. Pensamiento de diseño en la escuela: cómo lograr que surjan ideas innovadoras y hacerlas realidad: SM; 2016.

Meral E, Kayaalp F, Namli ZB. The role of argumentative writing in teaching controversial issues: a mixed methods research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. 2022; 9(1): p. 143-163. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1033411

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. [Online] Acceso 01 de Februaryde 2023. Disponible en: HYPERLINK "https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equity" .

Ní Ríordáin M, Johnston J, Walshe G. Making mathematics and science integration happen: key aspects of practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2015; 47(2): p. 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1078001

Ollora-Triana N, Corbí M, Jiménez-Eguizábal A, García-Zabaleta E. Semiologic process in the performance of a dance performance: a critical review. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad. 2023: p. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.90332

Ortega Sánchez D, López Padrón A. Educación y sociedad: claves interdisciplinares: Octaedro; 2023.

Ortega-Sánchez D, Greca-Dufranc IM, Alonso-Abad MP. Science in art: the cathedral of Burgos as a STEAM element of citizenship education: Ediciones Octaedro; 2022.

Ortega-Sánchez D. Teaching controversial issues and social problems from an integrated perspective. En Ortega-Sánchez D. Controversial issues and social problems for an integrated disciplinary teaching. Integrated science: Springer; 2022. p. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08697-7_1

Ortiz-Revilla J, Adúriz-Bravo A, Greca IM. A framework for epistemological discussion around an integrated STEM education. Science & Education. 2020; 29(4): p. 857-880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00131-9

Ortiz-Revilla J, Sanz-Camarero R, Greca IM. A critical look at theoretical models on integrated STEAM education. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. 2021; 87(2): p. 13-33. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8724634

Pace JL. Hard questions: Learning to teach controversial issues: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2021.

Parrise Consortium. PARRISE Project.

Penner A. Steam and social studies: creating an integrated classroom.

Pérez López IJ, Delgado Fernández M. Mejora de hábitos saludables en adolescentes desde la educación física escolar. Revista de Educación. 2013;(360).

Polya G. How to solve it Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1973.

Pondelíková R. Metódy a formy interpretácie výtvarného diela a ich využitie v procese výtvarnej edukácie Bratislava: MPC; 2015.

Pozuelos-Estrada , García-Prieto. Currículum integrado: estrategias para la práctica. Investigación en la Escuela. 2020;(100): p. 37-54. https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2020.i100.04

Prismas. Prismas Project.

Project Final Report-FIBONACCI. The FIBONACCI Project-Large- scale dissemination of inquiry-based science and mathematics education.

Quigley C, Herro D, Jamil FM. Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics. 2017; 117(1-2): p. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201

Ramirez-Verdugo MD. CLIL varieties across Europe. En Ioanno-Georgiou , Pavlou P, editores. Guidelines for CLIL implementation in Primary and Pre-primary Education.: European Comission; 2011. p. 13-20.

Rip A. The social context of 'science, technology and society' courses. Studies in Higher Education. 1979; 4(1): p. 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075077912331377061

Seakins A, Hobson M. Public understanding of science. En Akpan KST&B, editor. Science education. New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education.: Sense; 2017. p. 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_32

Short DB. The public understanding of science: 30 years of the Bodmer report.. School Science Review. 2013; 95(350): p. 39-44.

Steans J. Gender and international relations: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.

Stults-Kolehmainen MA. Humans have a basic physical and psychological need to move the body: Physical activity as a primary drive. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134049

Sullivan P, Lilburn P. Good questions for Math teaching: why ask them and what to ask CA: Math Solutions Publications; 1997.

Tan E, Calabrese-Barton A, Benavides AV. Engineering for sustainable communities: epistemic tools in support of equitable and consequential middle school engineering. Science Education. 2019; 103(4): p. 1011-1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21515

Toto GA, Strazzeri I. Sport and physical education as prevention against technological addictions. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2019; 14(1): p. 140-146. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.141.11

Treacy P, O'Donoghue J. Authentic integration: a model for integrating mathematics and science in classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2014; 45(5): p. 703-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.868543

Trott CD, Even TL, Frame SM. Merging the arts and sciences for collaborative sustainability action: a methodological framework. Sustainability Science. 2020; 15(4): p. 1067-1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00798-7

Van Avermaet P, Van Houtte M, Van den Branden K. Promoting equity and excellence in education: An overview. Equity and excellence in education. 2010;: p. 13-32. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832332

Vermeersch L, Vandenbroucke A. Kids, take a look at this! Visual literacy skills in the school curriculum. Journal of Visual LiteracyJournal of Visual Literacy. 2015; 34(1): p. 106-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2015.11674725

Vesterinen VM, Manassero-Mas MA, Vázquez-Alonso Á. History, philosophy, and sociology of science and science-technology-society traditions in science education: continuities and discontinuities. En Matthews MR, editor. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.: Springer; 2014. p. 1895-1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_58

Villegas T. The Official Blog of MCIE - Think Inclusive. [Online]; 2017. Acceso 1 de Februaryde 2023. Disponible en: HYPERLINK "https://www.thinkinclusive.us/post/inclusion-exclusion-segregation-and-integration-how-are-they-different" .

Weinberg AE, Sample McMeeking LB. Toward meaningful interdisciplinary education: high school teachers' views of mathematics and science integration. School, Science and Mathematics. 2017; 117(5): p. 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12224

Zeidler DL. STEM education: a deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2016; 11(1): p. 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z

Zoghlami W, Hawani A, Khiari H, Mnedla S, Marsigliante S, Elloumi A, et al. The relationship between emotional intelligence, anxiety, and performance in physical education and sport students. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236070

Cubierta "Integrative models of Education for Citizenship (Handbook) - 2nd edition"

Publicado

abril 24, 2024
Agencias de apoyo
Este manual ha sido elaborado bajo los auspicios de la Cátedra de Derechos Humanos y Cultura Democrática de la Universidad de Burgos., Este trabajo ha sido cofinanciado por el programa Erasmus de la Unión Europea.

Licencia

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Detalles sobre esta monografía

ISBN-13 (15)

978-84-18465-82-6

Fecha de primera publicación (11)

2024-04-24